Are UFOs based on an EM technology?

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. For the first time in half a century a subcommittee of the House of Representatives has held the first open hearing of the United States Congress on UFOs in June 2022. Of the 101 cases they have looked at, the subcommittee can only justify one as worthy of further study. Do you think it is important to study UFOs just on this one case alone?

Response

It is not entirely clear which case the subcommittee has deemed "important" in their eyes, but the biggest problem we see in the choice of UFO reports presented to the hearing is how many of the objects are just dark grey blobs in an otherwise mostly empty sky. Little information can be gleaned by a scientist to help analyse and compile the most common UFO observations. Apart from symmetry as being somehow relatively important in a number of UFOs, and the likelihood of having a metal outer surface and at other times glowing over large areas as seen at night, you need close up details to help better understand the true nature of these mysterious denizens of the sky.

For example, in one UFO report from a couple of U.S. military pilots, they were able to approach very close to one of the UFOs flying in the air. It was alleged that the pilots saw a semi-transparent outer metallic surface and an inner symmetrical opaque metal cube. To most people, this observation is hard to understand and hence difficult to assess how "important" this UFO observation is. However, from an electromagnetic scientist's perspective looking at this observation and after learning of the solution of the Abraham-Lorentz formula (which will explain so many common UFO observations already compiled by one ANU researcher), this observation shows the importance of building two symmetrical boxes. The outer "flexible" shell (deformed slightly to accelerate and allowed to return to its original symmetrical shape to stop the acceleration) is likely to hold the oscillating charge as needed to emit radiation for propulsion, whereas the inner shell (i.e., the cube) has to be perfectly symmetrical so as to help reduce the EM fields entering the box where the occupants and instruments are located. To some scientists who have studied UFOs properly and without bias or preconceived ideas, especially those of greater details mentioned by the witnesses and where the cases remain unexplained to this day, what the U.S. pilots allegedly observed is actually a significant piece of information. In fact, it helps to provide very useful engineering information about how the UFO is constructed, and can also give further support for the EM concept being employed.

What the U.S. Congress needs is a scientist who has properly studied the UFO observations and can give a visual presentation with plenty of UFO examples (and properly sourced for reference) on:

  1. What are the most common UFO observations as mentioned in those most detailed and unexplained UFO cases?
  2. Making it absolutely clear that the observations are revealing some kind of a new electromagnetic technology, whatever it might be. Certainly at the very least we know the objects are artificial since they come with doors, windows, antennas, and other artificial-looking features for which no kind of ball lightning or other natural phenomenon can reveal. Furthermore, this electromagnetic technology is not based on fossil fuel or nuclear technology.
  3. Explain the importance of the large glowing areas found on the external hull of a number of UFOs and start from the basis that these regions are highly reminiscent of the way an incandescent light bulb emits light.
  4. Now work from this position, using the light bulb as the starting point, and ask why the glowing region needs to emit light and over such a large area? What kind of energy is being emitted? Is this glowing region somehow critical to the general operation or movement of the object?
  5. Once a scientist focuses on radiation emissions from the glowing region, he will discover an obscure and controversial area of electromagnetism described mathematically by the Abraham-Lorentz formula in which radiation emitted from a "charged surface" in one direction. is said to cause the object to accelerate exponentially. The key word here is "exponential". This is very dramatic acceleration when given enough time. Something truly amazing exists in the laws of electromagnetism, and would help to explain a lot about how witnesses could observe UFO occupants. Well, we see that some scientists have published the "disturbing" implications of the formula after revealing the solution. The solution clearly reveals the exponential term. There is no escaping this fact. Yet there has been considerable controversy for more than a century since it was published back in 1905 among those physicists who have studied the problem. Does it occur in reality? Well, yes if you are referring to a particle accelerator. But can an object on its own and with the right charge/voltage and frequency of radiation emission be made to accelerate from a rest position to help reveal this exponential trend? Scientists are not quite sure. Generally the view is, "No, it is not possible." The problem seems to be our scientific understanding of how radiation moves ordinary matter. When we think an object is uncharged, there is acceleration when radiation is emitted predominantly in one direction from it, but the force of the recoiling radiation is considered weak (we only have to see this from the way our standard university physics textbooks reveal the answer, but not for the advanced "charged" case which you can only find in a few obscure textbooks in advanced electromagnetism). To increase the force on an uncharged object, you need a large area and a very thin metal skin on the hull to reduce the mass in order to allow enough energy in, say, sunlight, to make it accelerate, but not exponentially. However, something unusual happens when we charge the object and let it emit radiation of its own. The force appears to be amplified as if the radiation is able to grab hold of more charges and push against them and with it the crystalline structure of the metal hull. In other words, there is a suggestion that the recoiling force is more effective in the "charged" case than in the so-called "uncharged" case. Furthermore, at high enough energy density of the radiation being emitted, Albert Einstein's Unified Field Theory claims the gravitational field generated by the radiation can be strong enough to bend the radiation back on itself. If this is true, then this bending back of the energy is what is revealed in the mathematical solution of the Abraham-Lorentz formula.
  6. Now, when you bend radiation back on itself, radiation that is coming from the background environment behind the object can be made to bend around the object. It means the object can be rendered invisible. Okay. So if one does the work to study all UFOs from reputable and highly detailed UFO reports from genuine witnesses properly, you will notice how many of these objects can render themselves between visibility and invisibility in a periodic manner. Indeed, you will find cases in which some UFOs appear to want to demonstrate this observation to us at close range as if they are keen to give us a clue on how the objects work.

All this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Want more?

Well, we could mention the fact that an American physicist has already invented what an ANU researcher believes is a small-scale version of a typical glowing UFO emitting radiation for propulsion. He has patented the invention, but he has never been able to explain why it moves so significantly compared to the "uncharged" case. He also claimed to have observed a form of non-linear acceleration of his invention at a critical voltage/charge and frequency. He had to reduce the voltage to prevent his invention from flying away from a prescribed circuit he set for it.

There is considerable confidence that what this inventor saw is based on the solution of the Abraham-Lorentz formula. There is something interesting happening when you use charge at a critical density and complemented with a sufficient frequency of the oscillating charge for the radiation to make use of the extra charge over a given area of a metal surface that we need to look at and conduct proper testing.

We have to be prepared for the unexpected in this testing scenario.

This is the sort of thing the U.S. Congress needs to be hearing. Not a bunch of reports of distant blobs of grey or points-of-light (unless they can reveal in a video camera the rate of acceleration to help scientists calculate whether they are moving “exponentially”, or at the very least reveal things like a sinusoidal flight path as if the objects are again demonstrating some aspect of how the objects work i.e., the mathematical description of radiation emissions, which is a universally accepted pattern and one that all scientists, mathematicians, and apparently even the aliens, know about).

If we are going to solve the UFO mystery properly and determine if there is anything to advance our scientific knowledge and with it potentially a new EM technology (in fact, we already know what this technology is), you need an electromagnetic scientist who has studied UFO reports to give his/her assessment on the importance of certain UFO reports. He/she will give plenty of examples in history where the reports are "important". Once you understand the EM concept, it becomes much easier to sift out the reports that are "important" from the "less important" ones, and even determine which are more "genuine" compared to those that are clearly "not genuine".

Of course, to reach this level of understanding and insight into UFOs, someone has to do the work to find out. Otherwise, the hearing will just end up being another talkfest and nothing will progress from it. And other people will just continue to ridicule those genuine UFO witnesses when it is clear to an electromagnetic scientist how genuine the observations are.

 

2. Why do UFOs have large glowing regions as they move around r hover in the air? What is the purpose of these glowing regions, especially on the underside although the entire object can appear glowing, and in specific locations around the rim or at the apex of a triangular UFO?

Response

An excellent question to ask and something to have caught the eye of many UFO witnesses. Well firstly, these regions are not like a car headlight (even though it could help in this regard for those nocturnal UFOs moving near the ground if the entire surface is glowing), Often the glow is directly underneath as the object hovers in the air and may be moving in a certain direction. In some other UFO cases, a light beam may be shining beneath and directly downwards while the UFO hovers and moves. If UFOs are trying to see where they are going at night, it would be more appropriate to have the light beam or glowing region positioned in front rather than underneath. Because of this discovery, it is clear to an electromagnetic physicist that the glowing regions serve another purpose.

Now we can explain what this is.

When an electromagnetic spacecraft moves in accordance with the solution of the Abraham-Lorentz formula, you need an oscillating charge to be placed on the surface of the object for several reasons:

  1. The solution to the Abraham-Lorentz formula requires some charge to be present in order to provide certain unseen benefits to the people flying in this technology.
  2. When the charge is oscillating, radiation is emitted. And when radiation comes off the surface, the object recoils in the opposite direction. In other words, there is movement of the object during the emission not unlike the way we see in a rocket emitting exhaust gases.
  3. The presence of extra charge permits the radiation coming off the surface to grab hold of more charges and push against them in a more effective way compared to a lower charged environment.
  4. An oscillating charge helps to concentrate electromagnetic energy from the surroundings.
  5. At high levels of charge and a high enough frequency of oscillation of the charge, the concentrated energy from the surrounding can push against the radiation emissions from the object to such an extent that it is possible to cause a form of recycling of the emitted radiation. In other words, radiation can be bent back on itself. One of the side-effects of this energy recycling is for the object to appear invisible to the naked eye in a periodic manner in tune with the frequency of the oscillating charge.
  6. The presence of high amounts of charge, if negatively charged by the electrons, is that some of the electrons can escape the surface. As the electrons move away, they can collide with the air. Some of the oxygen and nitrogen atoms can become ionised temporarily after losing an electron or two following a collision with high speed electrons emerging from the UFO's glowing region. Once the atoms regain the electrons, they emit radiation in a particular region of the visible spectrum reminiscent of the colours found in auroras. Combined with a strong circulating current inside the UFO to generate a strong magnetic field externally, this can be beneficial in deflecting the ionised air, thereby reducing air pressure and allowing high speed flight of the UFO to take place without causing a sonic boom to be created or extra heat through frictional forces with the air to take place on the metal surface of the UFO. It also has the benefit of helping to deflect icy specks of dust and rocks in space as a means of protecting the crew inside the UFO during high speed flights. About the only downside to this is that if you stand near a stainless steel car body or road sign while facing at close range to the UFO, the high speed electrons coming off the UFO can hit the stainless steel object causing ionizing x-rays to be emitted (e.g., the Cash-Landrum UFO case).

While all of these benefits exist and help in implementing the solution of the Abraham-Lorentz formula for the purposes of carrying people and instruments in a new electromagnetic flying machine, another side-effect of applying an oscillating charge to the metal surface is to cause the metal to heat up. As the temperature rises, the air surrounding this charged region will shimmer not unlike the hot air rising from a ground in the desert causing a mirage to be seen. When seen front on to the UFO, this shimmering heat may make the object look like water is flowing over the surface.

However, there is one more side effect to come from this heating up effect: the metal will glow. This is due to the great preponderance of electrons getting knocked around by the atoms and other electrons. As the electrons change direction, radiation is emitted. Physicists call it Bremsstrahlung radiation. "Bremsstrahlung" is a German word meaning “braking radiation,” which refers to the way in which electrons are "braked" suddenly and made to turn a different direction when they hit another solid object. Now when that emitted radiation of the electrons is of a high enough frequency, not only is heat emitted, but the radiation enters the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, allowing a person to see the glowing effect just like we see in an incandescent light bulb.

 

3. Why do UFOs emit a humming or buzzing sound while in flight or as they are about to take off? What is the purpose of emitting this noise?

Response

The main reason why UFOs emit this buzzing noise is because of the way the electromagnetic technology works. When you are creating an oscillating charge, you want to quickly place and remove the charge on the metal surface at great speed. For this to work, the makers of the technology may likely employ a fast-switching mechanism. Similar to what you find in an electronics component called a relay. Basically a relay contains of two metal contact points and a metal lever in between. The lever is controlled by a solenoid that helps to move the lever very fast between the two contact points when a current flows through the coils of the solenoid. As the metal lever hits one contact, a tiny sound is emitted. When the impact of the lever is made with both contact points and done at high speed, it will sound like a buzzing noise. The mechanical lever effect is what helps to inject and extract the charge from the metal surface.

The humming part similar to the sound of a swarm of bees may also be created by the ionised air vibrating very quickly near the UFO as the charge on the metal surface reverses polarity. So instead of removing the charge to equilibrium, the charge may swing completely to the opposite positive range before swinging back to the negative range. This reversing effect on the charge causes the ionised air to vibrate.

 

How is this EM technology built?

Response

The whole aim of the EM technology is to make full use of a high oscillating voltage/charge on a smooth outer metal surface or hull of the electromagnetic spacecraft (or electromagnetic aircraft) and to have this charge positioned in such a way as to help emit radiation for propulsion predominantly in one direction so as to cause the object to move in one direction. This positioning of the charge and/or how much variation in the charge density is attained through the use of curvature of the metal hull do need careful adjustment and needs to be in precise locations so as to prevent the object from spinning (well, you want the object to move in one direction, right?), as well as to help stop the acceleration when needed. Physically the location points for this higher charge density or glowing regions containing the oscillating charge are usually placed in a way that would allow the object to accelerate efficiently and at the same time quickly even out the charge density through computer-control and/or mechanically arrange the glowing regions in a symmetrical arrangement around the spacecraft such that the recoiling forces on the object over these regions can be made to cancel each other out. Thus the object can be made to stop its acceleration even when radiation is still being emitted. Where to place these glowing regions of oscillating charge is depended on the type of design one chooses to come up with when developing an electromagnetic spacecraft. There could be glowing regions arranged around the circumferential edge of the symmetrical electromagnetic spacecraft. However, a minimum of three glowing regions arranged in a perfect equilateral triangle can achieve the same effect.

If using a mechanical device (mainly a metal spherical ball at the end of a rod) to press against a shape-memory alloy hull to create the extra curvature needed to increase the charge density and with it the energy density of the emitted radiation (which controls how strong the recoiling force is), a minimum of one such device can be used for this purpose if the positioning of this device is precise and inline with the centre of gravity of the spacecraft. This has the benefit of requiring the least amount of materials to build the electromagnetic spacecraft and hence can travel that little bit faster near the speed of light to make journey times shorter or travel a little bit further for a little extra time for the occupants. However, such a design using a single mechanical device would require an extraordinary level of precision engineering-wise to ensure everything is lined up correctly for movement to take place in a linear fashion. Otherwise, the best option is to use multiple curved metal domes or flatter glowing electrodes arranged in a symmetrical way around the spacecraft and with finer computer-control of the charge and frequency to ensure the recoiling force is evenly distributed for the motion to be linear and smooth.

Now, although radiation always moves solid matter, whether or not it is charged, the decision by the makers of this technology to use radiation and an oscillating charge on the surface for propelling an object is because of the type of acceleration that takes place: it is said to be "exponential". It is for this very reason why we have symmetrical UFOs having occupants inside of them. Someone has discovered the concept and have implemented it in a real-life technology. And now, finally, it is our turn to try it out for ourselves.

Now in order to apply this EM concept of "exponential acceleration", you must first try to concentrate energy from the surroundings. Space naturally contains energy. Therefore, the simplest way to achieve this is to apply an oscillating charge on the surface of the metal hull. Generally, the higher the frequency of the oscillating charge and the greater the charge itself over a given area, the more the charge will concentrate this energy of space.

Second, you must tap onto this energy to produce a voltage/charge. The most effective and lowest-cost solution to achieve this task is to add a large metal antenna to the spacecraft design. The aim here is to electromagnetically cut through the concentrated energy as a way to generate a voltage at opposite ends of the antenna.

Third, we need to store the electrical energy. One possible solution is to build a large super-conducting ring (beneath the floor) cooled by the temperature of space (unless it is some kind of alien technology, in which case room temperature superconductors may exist). This ring will allow electrical energy to be stored in large quantities as it circulates inside the ring endlessly without frictional resistance. Indeed, the presence of an initial energy source to start providing an oscillating charge for a spacecraft starting in a rest position is possible with the help of this super-conducting ring. Otherwise, use a fuel-based engine that can generate vast amounts of voltage/charge (see the Lonnie Zamora UFO case, and the Cash-Landrum UFO case).

Fourth, we begin to utilise some of the stored energy to generate an oscillating voltage/charge. As the energy slowly builds up in the "battery system", a moment will come when some of the energy can be used to help power the electromagnetic propulsion system. Wrap an electrically conducting coil (and insulated) around a portion of the ring to help pick up on some of this circulating electrical energy. For the charge in the coil to be oscillating, we use a fast mechanical switching device (it will make the sound of a buzz, due to the tiny noise produced by metal parts making the briefest contact). If you design the system in a clever way, you can switch in one direction to enable energy to be injected into the ring by one set of coils. Switch it in the opposite direction for some of the energy from the surrounds to be extracted. It means that the whole machine can start to "breathe" in an electromagnetic way. The ring is acting like the "lungs" of an organism. Instead of storing and expelling air as living things do, an electromagnetic spacecraft would store and expel electrical energy.

Fifth, it is time to place some of this oscillating energy onto the surface of the spacecraft as part of the process of preparing the spacecraft to propel itself. Why? Because what you are aiming for is to generate radiation emissions from a charged surface. As every scientist will tell you, an oscillating charge emits radiation. Also, radiation has the inherent ability to move solid matter, whether or not the matter itself is charged. It means that there is expected to be some kind of acceleration when a force from the radiation is exerted onto solid matter.

But how do we actually make the spacecraft accelerate?

To accelerate, we need an outer metal shell. Not just any metal shell, but one made of a superelastic, high-temperature resistant and tough shape-memory alloy. Although you can use a tough and rigid alloy for this purpose, the shape of this hull needs to be carefully considered as you design with curvature in mind at specific points and have this charge and frequency computer-controlled. Otherwise, for a more mechanically based approach to distributing charge of a higher charge density at specific point(s), using a flexible shape-memory alloy as the material for building the hull of the electromagnetic spacecraft. Now here is the clever bit. By using a shape-memory alloy, it will be flexible enough to permit a mechanical device inside the spacecraft to distort the shape slightly. It doesn't have to be much. Just enough to make the shape of the outer metal shell asymmetric in a specific way with the aim of getting the spacecraft to move in a straight line. Suddenly the radiation emission causes the charged object to accelerate. Depending on frequency and voltage and how lightweight the spacecraft is, the acceleration could be dramatic or start slowly. It doesn't matter. So long as there is acceleration because once you have movement, the object will move in an increasingly more dramatic way over time.

A kind of runaway result, you might say.

Finally, due to the intense oscillating electromagnetic fields being generated externally, we need a symmetrical inner metal shell (it could be shaped like a sphere, a cube, or hemisphere, for example) separated from the outer metal shell by a gap. This inner shell does not need to change its shape. Its main purpose is to be as perfectly symmetrical as possible to help protect people and instruments from the radiation emissions on the outside. This is the familiar Faraday's cage for reducing EM fields internally. However, there is one more unexpected benefit from having this inner shell. You see, radiation generates a gravitational field in accordance with Einstein's Unified Field Theory, and it is believed the gravitational field and the oscillating electromagnetic field could be one and the same field. If this is true and experiments can prove or show it is highly likely the unified field concept is valid, then should one field go down in its energy density, so does the other field. Thus, inside a symmetrical Faraday cage of the spacecraft, not only does the oscillating electromagnetic field get reduced to zero (or very close to it, depending on how symmetrical the metal box is), but also the gravitational field must reduce as well. Since it is the gravitational field that causes the inertial forces to get exerted on your body (i.e., moves the charges making up your body), you will now have the technological means of controlling gravity and the inertial forces internally. The only other method of controlling inertial forces is biological. More specifically the use of low-mass pilots. Thus being small and very thin will greatly aid in your ability to withstand inertial forces inside an electromagnetic spacecraft.

This interesting discovery now makes it possible to explain how UFOs can rapidly accelerate or change directions. It is not a perfect or instantaneous thing. There is a limit on how much the pilots of the EM flying machine can withstand the inertial forces. But with the right type of thin and short pilots (bred to be like certain flying insects here on Earth due to their incredible light weight nature) as well as a symmetrical box used to house the pilots inside, they can achieve far more dramatic changes in acceleration than the average well-trained human pilot of any military fighter jet.

Now that you have a tiny taste of the new electromagnetic technology emerging from UFO reports, welcome to a new chapter in our history. The future has finally arrived!